Wire Models, Wired
A brief history of UCSF Chimera
Published October 29, 2014
The molecular graphics software called Chimera, written and supported by a team of scientists in Tom Ferrin’s lab at the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), has been cited over 7000 times and helps biologists and drug developers visualize molecules and biological structures in 3D at various resolutions. The tool has a personal history that traces back to 1994, and an ancestral history that stretches nearly four full decades earlier, to a London lab in 1955 and a man named Robert Langridge, also known as the pioneer of molecular graphics.
Though computation has changed almost indescribably since the middle of the 20th century, Ferrin faces some of the same challenges Langridge faced, such as how to work with data sets that far exceed the memory capacity of his computational tools. For Ferrin, Director of the UCSF Resource for Biocomputing, Visualization, and Informatics (RBVI), this problem has most recently presented itself in a collaboration with 2014 Nobel prize winner Eric Betzig, who with others developed super-resolution light microscopy, a technique that produces terabytes of data and presents Ferrin with the task of visualizing that data. “It’s an exciting problem to have,” says Ferrin. “Technology is always marching onward.”
The Beginning: Molecular Virtual Reality
It was 1955 when Robert Langridge published his first important paper, in Nature, detailing the molecular structure of DNA based on X-ray diffraction data. Langridge was working with Maurice Wilkins, who along with James Watson and Francis Crick was awarded the Nobel Prize for their discoveries concerning the molecular structure of nucleic acids in 1962. Back then, there were two approaches to visualizing molecular structures. Scientists built wire models of them or sketched them. “The picture of DNA that’s in that article, I drew with a pen,” says Langridge, who is now retired and living in Berkeley CA, a professor emeritus at UCSF.
Doing the calculations that defined the structure was even more cumbersome. Langridge used a Marchant Calculator, a 1911 invention that looks like a cross between a typewriter and a cash register. It took two weeks to calculate a Fourier transform. “At the end of that two weeks, after modifying the model, you had to do it all again,” says Langridge.
Around this time, Langridge got access to an IBM 650 computer, released in 1953, (a bi-quinary system) and learned to program it. Despite the fact that computers were so new that Fortran hadn’t even emerged as a language yet (the first FORTRAN compiler came out in 1957), and that he had only 2000 words of memory to work with, he loved programming and reduced the computation time of his calculations from two weeks to thirty minutes.
In 1964, Langridge, who had moved to Harvard University, received a phone call from his friend Cy Levinthal at MIT. Levinthal had come across a new computer system developed at MIT’s Project MAC, a defense-department funded effort to improve computation and, in particular, time sharing and computer graphics. The system had an advanced display that could show pictures in three dimensions. The displays were still rudimentary cathode ray tube consoles limited to simple line drawings, but the system also had a “crystal ball,” a bit like a track ball, that could be used to rotate an image on the screen.
Langridge crossed the river into Cambridge immediately and spent many nights programming the computer to display molecules and spin them in virtual space.
Langridge and Levinthal had created what was among the earliest virtual reality experiences. Prior to their graphics, the wire models that scientists built by hand were room-sized. The model of hemoglobin dwarfed the men that built it. The models were impossible to turn, they were brittle, they were frustratingly inaccurate, and you couldn’t get at their insides once they were constructed. “Also,” says Langridge, “pieces fell off.”
Yet when Langridge and Levinthal showed their molecular graphics to other scientists, their reaction was, essentially, Meh. “They asked, ‘Why do we need this? We have our wire models,’” says Langridge.
The Middle: Software Advances
The real barrier wasn’t the utility of the new tool; it was the practicality. The computer Langridge was working on was a two million dollar system that very few institutions had access to. But one group did see the utility. The National Institutes of Health Division of Research Resources, which supported technology development, granted Langridge funding to advance molecular graphics. In 1969, with this funding, he launched his Computer Graphics Laboratory at Princeton University.
In the meantime, computation was advancing on its own. Moore’s Law, the doubling of the number of transistors within an integrated circuit every two years, had already established itself as a trend in 1965, and costs were falling similarly. Still, computer graphics hardware was rare and expensive and would remain so for another two decades. “There were different flavors from one machine to another,” recalls Langridge. “It was very hard to share.”
In 1976, Langridge moved the lab to UCSF, where he met and hired Ferrin. They adopted UNIX, giving the tools some portability, though every computer system still had it’s own display language. Over the coming two decades, Ferrin and Langridge would design and redesign a series of molecular graphics systems, each one advancing with computing platforms, operating systems, and graphics capabilities. The first, called MIDS, was designed to support color graphics capabilities. In 1980, they developed the next-generation system called MIDAS, a complete rewrite, with an attempt to create a portable graphics language with documented source code to allow others to see under the hood.
The next incarnation, MidasPlus, was the first package written with an open architecture designed to allow others to contribute functions and extensions to the system. However, since code sharing and portability were still challenging and graphics hardware still costly, many research teams came to visit Langridge’s lab to use his systems.
Other teams were also at work developing molecular graphics. In particular, Alwyn Jones at Uppsala University in Sweden took on the task of answering the needs of crystallographers for electron density fitting tools. Langridge’s team was more focused on drug design. One of the most striking examples of how graphics aids drug developers searching for small molecule drugs is the discovery of buckminsterfullerene as an HIV drug. Based on the graphical display of HIV protease, a graduate student made an off-handed remark that “anything might fit into the protease, even buckminsterfullerene,” says Langridge. “It did.”
The Future: Technology Marches Onward
In the mid-1990s, Langridge retired and Ferrin took over as Principal Investigator. The lab took on its current name, replacing the original “Computer Graphics Laboratory” moniker. “Times changed,” says Ferrin.
Indeed, computer graphics was in the midst of a transformation. During the 1980s, the team had taken advantage of SGI (Silicon Graphics, Inc.) workstations with onboard graphics hardware. But in the 1990s, demand from the computer gaming community drove the rapid development of very large scale integration (VLSI) graphics. Graphics hardware was no longer rare and expensive. “Now graphics chips come for free on virtually every laptop and desktop on the market,” says Ferrin.
To keep up with these changes, Ferrin decided to replace MidasPlus and create Chimera in 1994. Today the tool is used to visualize molecular models made using crystallography, electron microscopy, NMR, and also theoretical models made using hybrid methods that combine experimental data and theoretical computational methods.
Work is also underway to support super-resolution light microscopy in a collaboration between Ferrin, Betzig of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute’s Janelia Farm Research Campus, and Dyche Mullins of UCSF. The project began when a post-doc in the Mullins lab, Lillian Fritz-Laylin, collected a time-series of images of macrophage-like immune cells in motion using Betzig’s new microscope. The microscope captures 3D images about once per second at resolutions of about 200 to 250 nanometers, not atomic resolution, but still at a dynamic level never before seen. The data — 40 terabytes in all — came home with Fritz-Laylin, but was left untouched for months because she had no tools to use to visualize it.
For the past year or so, Ferrin’s lab has been working to enhance Chimera to read, process and visualize the data. Simply reading a terabyte off a disk takes three hours and, since no computer has a TB of real memory, he also faced the same limitations Langridge faced back when bytes came at a premium. While the new microscopy has challenged Ferrin, he and the other collaborators have also provided Betzig with feedback that has helped him improve his instrument. The collaborators hope to publish soon. “These are some of the first 3D images of cells in motion,” he says. “It’s just fantastic.”
-- Elizabeth Dougherty
Other tales
-
Viruses for Good
Mihnea Bostina
Published 26 August 2026
Drugging the Undruggable
Dhirendra Simanshu
Published 29 June 2026
-
Structure-guided Antibiotics
Andrés Palencia
Published 27 March 2026
The Stories Antibodies Tell
Jean-Philippe Julien
Published 27 January 2026
-
Reshaping Membranes
Melanie Ohi
Published 23 November 2025
Probing Microbes
Gira Bhabha
Published 30 September 2025
-
Drawn to the Light
Emina Stojković
Published 30 July 2025
The Final Phase
George Phillips
Published 31 May 2025
-
Mind and Muscle
Ryan Hibbs
Published 28 March 2025
The Shapes of Energy
Luke Chao
Published 12 December 2024
-
Predicting Proteins
Jens Meiler
Published 25 November 2024
Death Metal
Steven Damo
Published 28 April 2024
-
Context Matters
Bing Chen
Published 30 January 2024
The Crystal Whisperer
Sarah Bowman
Published 29 November 2023
-
Data in Motion
Nozomi Ando
Published 29 September 2023
The Monstrous Maw
André Hoelz
Published 28 June 2023
-
Second Takes
Andrea Thorn
Published 28 February 2023
Radical reactions
Yvain Nicolet
Published 31 January 2023
-
Floppy Physics
Eva Nogales
Published 30 November 2022
Structure of Equity
Jamaine Davis
Published 28 September 2022
-
Life and Death of a Cell
Evris Gavathiotis
Published 28 July 2022
Follow the glow
Kurt Krause
Published 29 April 2022
-
Resolution solutions
Willy Wriggers
Published 25 February 2022
Of enzymes and membranes
Ming Zhou
Published 28 October 2021
-
Step-by-step
Gabrielle Rudenko
Published 26 September 2021
Moving muscle
Montserrat Samso
Published 26 July 2021
-
Particle catcher
Stefan Raunser
Published 28 June 2021
Designer drugs
Ho Leung Ng
Published 25 February 2021
-
Right place, right time
Ernesto Fuentes
Published 29 January 2021
Shape-shifting secrets of membranes
James Hurley
Published 27 November 2020
-
Enzymatic action
Cynthia Wolberger
Published 28 September 2020
Rules of motion
Priyamvada Acharya
Published 31 July 2020
-
Cosmic Squared
Michael Cianfrocco
Published 27 June 2020
Kaps are Cool
Yuh Min Chook
Published 28 April 2020
-
Spiraling into focus
Carsten Sachse
Published 29 March 2020
Seeing cilia
Alan Brown
Published 27 February 2020
-
For the Love of EM
Guy Schoehn
Published 27 January 2020
Protein Puddles
Michael Rosen
Published 16 December 2019
-
Changing channels
Daniel Minor Jr.
Published 27 September 2019
Listening Tips
Marcos Sotomayor
Published 30 July 2019
-
Beyond Cool
Published 31 May 2019
Hao Wu
A Higher Order
Published 30 May 2019
-
Aye Aye Captain
Alexandre Bonvin
Published 29 April 2019
The PARP Family Family
John Pascal
Published 28 February 2019
-
Frame by frame
Nikolaus Grigorieff
Published 28 January 2019
Predicting Success
Bil Clemons
Published 18 December 2018
-
Curiouser and Curiouser
Ramaswamy Subramanian
Published 27 November 2018
Rely on This
Sjors Scheres
Published 26 October 2018
-
Proteins out of bounds
Gerhard Wagner
Published 27 September 2018
Hiding in plain sight
Gaya Amarasinghe
Published 27 July 2018
-
Jumping Genes
Orsolya Barabas
Published 27 June 2018
Data Whisperer
Karolin Luger
Published 30 May 2018
-
Flipping the Switch
Jacqueline Cherfils
Published 27 April 2018
Tooling Around
Andrew Kruse
Published 29 March 2018
-
Comings and Goings
Tom Rapoport, Ph.D.
Published 23 February 2018
Transcriptional Rhythm
Seth Darst
Published 27 January 2018
-
The Language of Gene Regulation
Daniel Panne
Published 21 November 2017
Not Your Average Protein
James Fraser
Published 23 October 2017
-
Message Received
Sebastien Granier
Published 24 August 2017
Resistance is Futile
Celia Schiffer
Published 28 July 2017
-
Twist of Fate
Leemor Joshua-Tor
Published 28 June 2017
Drug Designer
John Buolamwini
Published 30 May 2017
-
Mathematically Minded
James Holton
Published 28 April 2017
Garbage Out
Kay Diederichs
Published 30 March 2017
-
Fixer Upper
Brandt Eichman
Published 27 February 2017
Mobilizers
Phoebe Rice
Published 31 January 2017
-
Escape Artist
Katya Heldwein
Published 19 December 2016
Nature’s Confectioner
Jochen Zimmer
Published 29 November 2016
-
State of Fusion
Jason McLellan
Published 27 October 2016
Here Be Dragons
Brian Fox
Published 28 September 2016
-
SBGrid Assumes Ownership of PyMOLWiki
Published 15 September 2016
Pharm Team
Oleg Tsodikov
Published 24 August 2016
-
Spiro-Gyra
Alejandro Buschiazzo
Published 27 July 2016
Turning the DIALS
Nicholas Sauter
Published 29 June 2016
-
Pipeline Dreams
Bridget Carragher and Clint Potter
Published 26 April 2016
U-Store-It
The SBGrid Data Bank provides an affordable and sustainable way to preserve and share structural biology data
Published 28 March 2016
-
Big Questions, Big Answers
Jennifer Doudna
Published 22 February 2016
Not a Structural Biologist
Enrico Di Cera
Published 17 December 2015
-
Divide and Conquer
Kevin Corbett
Published 19 November 2015
Computing Cellular Clockworks
Klaus Schulten
Published 23 October 2015
-
Trans-Plant
Gang Dong
Published 26 September 2015
Keep on Moving
James Berger
Published 23 August 2015
-
Totally Tubular
Antonina Roll-Mecak
Published 27 July 2015
From Disorder, Function
Julie Forman-Kay
Published 29 June 2015
-
Into Alignment
Geoff Barton
Published 27 May 2015
Two Labs, Many Methods
Michael Sattler
Published 28 April 2015
-
Picture This
Georgios Skiniotis
Published 20 March 2015
Intron Intrigue
Navtej Toor
Published 20 February 2015
-
Cut and Paste
Martin Jinek
Published 28 January 2015
Basics and Beyond
Qing Fan
Published 18 December 2014
-
Bloodletting and Other Studies
Pedro José Barbosa Pereira
Published 25 November 2014
Wire Models, Wired
A brief history of UCSF Chimera
Published 29 October 2014
-
In Search of…New Drugs
Doug Daniels
Published 30 September 2014
An Affinity for Affinity…and Corals
John C. Williams
Published 29 August 2014
-
Pete Meyer, Ph.D.
Research Computing Specialist
Published 22 August 2014
Justin O'Connor
Sr. System Administrator
Published 20 August 2014
-
Carol Herre
Software Release Engineer
Published 15 August 2014
Elizabeth Dougherty
Science Writer
Published 13 August 2014
-
Andrew Morin, Ph.D.
Policy Research Fellow
Published 11 August 2014
Jason Key, Ph.D.
Associate Director of Technology and Innovation
Published 8 August 2014
-
Piotr Sliz, Ph.D.
Principal Investigator, SBGrid
Published 1 August 2014
New Kid on the Block
James Chen
Published 29 July 2014
-
Membrane Master
Tamir Gonen
Published 30 June 2014
The Natural Bridge
Piotr Sliz
Published 13 June 2014
-
Surprise, Surprise
Catherine Drennan
Published 26 April 2014
Gone Viral
Olve Peersen
Published 20 March 2014
-
All Who Wander Are Not Lost
Frank Delaglio
Published 24 February 2014
The Raw and the Cooked
Graeme Winter
Published 24 January 2014
-
Vacc-elerator
Peter Kwong
Published 17 December 2013
Structural Storyteller
Karin Reinisch
Published 15 November 2013
-
The Fixer
Jane Richardson
Published 28 October 2013
Inside the Box
Mishtu Dey
Published 17 September 2013
-
Sensing a Change
Brian Crane
Published 16 August 2013
Towards Personalized Oncology
Mark Lemmon
Published 16 July 2013
-
Brush with Fame
Yizhi Jane Tao
Published 14 June 2013
Toxic Avenger
Borden Lacy
Published 21 May 2013
-
Pushing the Boundaries
Stephen Harrison
Published 22 April 2013
Strength in Numbers
Joseph Ho
Published 18 March 2013
-
One Lab, Many Methods
Wesley Sundquist
Published 12 February 2013
Unplanned Pioneer
Tim Stevens
Published 15 January 2013
-
From Actin to Action
Emil Pai
Published 11 January 2013
Unstructured
A Brief History of CCP4
Published 12 December 2012
-
Stop, Collaborate and Listen
Eleanor Dodson
Published 5 November 2012
X-PLORer
Axel Brunger
Published 1 October 2012
-
Share the Wealth
Zbyszek Otwinowski
Published 22 August 2012
Unraveling RNA
Anna Pyle
Published 18 July 2012
-
Sharper Image
Pawel Penczek and SPARX
Published 4 June 2012
Creative Copy Cat
Pamela Bjorkman
Published 25 April 2012
-
Charm and Diplomacy
Gerard Kleywegt
Published 7 March 2012
From Curiosity to Cure
Marc Kvansakul
Published 13 December 2011
-
The Lure of the Sandbox
Paul Emsley and Coot
Published 15 October 2011
Springsteen, Tolkien, Protein
Alwyn Jones and Frodo
Published 17 June 2011
-
Structures Solved Simply
Paul Adams and Tom Terwilliger on Phenix
Published 2 June 2011
Playing the Odds
Randy Read and Phaser
Published 19 May 2011
-
Escape from the Darkroom
Wolfgang Kabsch and XDS
Published 19 May 2011
Crystallography for Kids
Lynne Howell
Published 17 May 2011
-
Better, Faster, Stronger, More
Victor Lamzin and ARP/wARP
Published 17 May 2011
Side-Track to Success
Ning Zheng
Published 13 May 2011