Search
Bluesky

SBGridTV
Button for mobile navigation
Join us

Tale

Frame by frame

Nikolaus Grigorieff

HHMI’s Janelia Research Campus

Published January 28, 2019

Rejection is an unavoidable part of science, whether it’s funding for research or manuscripts submitted for publication. But few people showcase their setbacks like Nikolaus “Niko” Grigorieff, whose lab web site features a separate “rejection” section.

As a methods developer in structural biology, Grigorieff may be best known for pioneering a technique known as motion correction in cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM). But the numbers tell a different story.

All together, his papers have been cited about 9,500 times, excluding self-citations. Compare that to the 45,000 downloads of rejection letters his web site logged as of January 2019 for the 20 papers (so far) that were vetoed by one or more journals before being published.

“People love reading these rejections,” says Grigorieff, who started posting them in 2010 after lab discussions of frustration with the peer review process.

One notable rejection involves one of the group’s pivotal motion correction studies. It demonstrated how taking movies and analyzing them frame by frame can restore atomic detail to blurred molecular images. The rejection letters from Nature Methods and PNAS are posted with the PDF of the 2012 paper in Structure. “After this paper was published, everybody in the cryo-EM field who has a movie-capable camera switched to movies,” he comments on the entry.

Rotavirus double-layer particles come into focus after motion correction using the movie technology pioneered by Grigorieff and his colleagues. Courtesy N.Grigorieff

Other authors are welcome to contribute their rejection letters as soon as a paper is accepted elsewhere, but so far only one other research lab has volunteered a sample.

Grigorieff grew up in Berlin, Germany. He didn’t like to hang out with people, preferring to fiddle with electronics and computers at home. His fix-it skills made him popular with friends and family, at least most of the time. After his mom turned off the electricity because he was playing his music too loud, he built a generator to power his stereo independently.

He even wrote his own computer games, including a strategic game that beat him a few times. These days, online gaming helps him maintain family ties. Since he moved away from Germany after his undergraduate degree, he has a Skype chat with his brother almost every Sunday, and then they play an online game together.

Grigorieff picked up his EM skills during his physics PhD training at the University of Bristol in the UK. For postdoctoral work, he moved to the Cambridge lab of Richard Henderson, where he encountered proteins and the related cryo-EM motion problem.

In materials science, “you switch on the electron beam, the sample starts moving, and you wait until it stops to take a picture. There, you can get high resolution without movies,” Grigorieff says. “But with a protein or a cell, it’s getting more and more damaged while you wait. By the time it stops moving, there's nothing left. You have to switch on the beam and take a picture immediately when the sample is still intact. But you had to accept that it was always a little blurred because of this movement.”

At first, Grigorieff helped develop the two-dimensional electron crystallography in the Henderson lab’s push to higher resolution. Soon, his interest was captured by single-particle cryo-EM, which could not then be used to build a three-dimensional atomic model. Two main research groups had developed software (SPIDER from Joachim Frank and IMAGIC from Marin van Heel). Grigorieff found a few processing steps that could be done more efficiently, so he began to develop what would become Frealign, a computer program to refine single-particle structures and correct for image distortions commonly found in electron microscope images.

After five years at MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Grigorieff heard about a cryo-EM opening at Brandeis University near Boston, Mass. He was ready for a new adventure, and a move to the United States would put him closer to his then girlfriend in Arizona. He joined the Brandeis faculty in 1999 and one year later secured long-term funding as an investigator of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute.

“As a Hughes investigator, you can have crazy ideas,” he says. “We could try out things that otherwise would have been harder or impossible. It’s an enormous freedom.”

At Brandeis, he continued to develop Frealign. He also developed other single-particle EM tools and applied them in collaborations with other structural biology groups. One milestone was CTFFIND, an important step in achieving accurate high resolution with cryo-EM that became the industry standard. These tools have been refined and integrated with many others in a complete user-friendly software package called cisTEM, published in eLife March 2018, that covers the pipeline from imaging to 3D reconstruction for single particle EM.

At home, Grigorieff can sit for hours in the backyard with a telescope and a beer, looking at the quiet night sky and photographing celestial objects. Like samples caught in the cryo-EM beam, objects move across the sky. To take a photograph, a computer takes the motion into account, guiding the telescope and camera to track the object over the hours needed to collect an image.

In the night sky, Orion is easily found by the three stars in a row that make up the belt. Orion’s Sword hangs below the belt and contains the Orion Nebula, pictured here. Also called M42, the Orion Nebula is a stellar nursery where new stars are born, about 1300 light years away. Courtesy N.Grigorieff

For proteins shaken up by the electron beam, several scientists had proposed taking movies instead of pictures and aligning the movie frames to undo the blurring that normally occurs.

Suddenly, in 2011, there was a new experimental technology that could achieve this. Called a direct detector, the camera directly and quickly recorded electrons reflected off the protein sample. Three companies were developing direct detectors in collaboration with research groups, one of which was located in San Diego. Time for a sabbatical. In Boston, Grigorieff had met and married the niece of the immigration lawyer handling his green card, the children’s book author Maria Gianferrari. “We packed up the whole family, dog included, and drove from Massachusetts to San Diego for 13 months,” he says.

The sabbatical project resulted in the first report of this kind of movie collection and image correction in 2012 in the Journal of Structural Biology. First author Axel Brilot, a graduate student with Grigorieff at Brandeis, was honored with a "Paper of the Year" award in 2015. And in the scientific background for the 2017 Nobel Prize in Chemistry for development of cryo-EM awarded to Henderson, Frank, and Jacque Dubochet, the 2012 paper was cited as one of the recent advances that built on the earlier groundbreaking work by the three scientists. (The follow-up paper that demonstrated how well the technique works was rejected twice before being published.)

In 2012, Grigorieff returned to Brandeis. He realized cryo-EM was about to change, with expensive new microscopes and detectors that needed a critical mass of scientists for support. He could have tried to forge a bigger alliance in the Boston area, but he had a connection with HHMI’s Janelia Research Campus. He had helped install the first big cryo-EM instrument and had nearly accepted an offer to be a founding investigator there a decade earlier. It made more sense to him to take advantage of a new shared facility for investigators at Janelia in Virginia, where he could also devote 100% of his time to research.

With his HHMI funding recently renewed, Grigorieff will move the family back to New England in 2020, when his daughter finishes high school. This time, he will work at University of Massachusetts Medical School in Worcester. He is contemplating his next big scientific direction.

He may follow up on a feasibility study to image proteins inside cells proposed with collaborators Peter Rickgauer and Winfried Denk of the Max Planck Institute of Neurobiology in Germany. They outlined their approach in a May 2017 paper in eLife. The paper proposed a way of studying single proteins in the crowded environment of the cell, using single particle cryo-EM to catch them in interactions with other molecules.

Structural biologists purify proteins they want to study, making inferences about their function and activity from the shape and chemistry of the atomic structure. Cell biologists wonder how scientists can be sure proteins work that way inside living cells, Grigorieff says. “There’s a lot you can learn from purified protein, but it’s a valid point.”

There are many caveats and obstacles to overcome. The structure of the proteins would need to be known to find them inside the cell, they would have to be on the bigger side, and the cells themselves would be frozen, stopping all the interesting movements. Yet, it should be possible to determine what is next to what and how molecules interact in these cells to bring them to life, says Grigorieff. “It’s early days.”

--Carol Cruzan Morton

Other tales

  • Mind and Muscle

    Ryan Hibbs

    Published 28 March 2025

    The Shapes of Energy

    Luke Chao

    Published 12 December 2024

  • Predicting Proteins

    Jens Meiler

    Published 25 November 2024

    Death Metal

    Steven Damo

    Published 28 April 2024

  • Context Matters

    Bing Chen

    Published 30 January 2024

    The Crystal Whisperer

    Sarah Bowman

    Published 29 November 2023

  • Data in Motion

    Nozomi Ando

    Published 29 September 2023

    The Monstrous Maw

    André Hoelz

    Published 28 June 2023

  • Second Takes

    Andrea Thorn

    Published 28 February 2023

    Radical reactions

    Yvain Nicolet

    Published 31 January 2023

  • Floppy Physics

    Eva Nogales

    Published 30 November 2022

    Structure of Equity

    Jamaine Davis

    Published 28 September 2022

  • Life and Death of a Cell

    Evris Gavathiotis

    Published 28 July 2022

    Follow the glow

    Kurt Krause

    Published 29 April 2022

  • Resolution solutions

    Willy Wriggers

    Published 25 February 2022

    Of enzymes and membranes

    Ming Zhou

    Published 28 October 2021

  • Step-by-step

    Gabrielle Rudenko

    Published 26 September 2021

    Moving muscle

    Montserrat Samso

    Published 26 July 2021

  • Particle catcher

    Stefan Raunser

    Published 28 June 2021

    Designer drugs

    Ho Leung Ng

    Published 25 February 2021

  • Right place, right time

    Ernesto Fuentes

    Published 29 January 2021

    Shape-shifting secrets of membranes

    James Hurley

    Published 27 November 2020

  • Enzymatic action

    Cynthia Wolberger

    Published 28 September 2020

    Rules of motion

    Priyamvada Acharya

    Published 31 July 2020

  • Cosmic Squared

    Michael Cianfrocco

    Published 27 June 2020

    Kaps are Cool

    Yuh Min Chook

    Published 28 April 2020

  • Spiraling into focus

    Carsten Sachse

    Published 29 March 2020

    Seeing cilia

    Alan Brown

    Published 27 February 2020

  • For the Love of EM

    Guy Schoehn

    Published 27 January 2020

    Protein Puddles

    Michael Rosen

    Published 16 December 2019

  • Changing channels

    Daniel Minor Jr.

    Published 27 September 2019

    Listening Tips

    Marcos Sotomayor

    Published 30 July 2019

  • Beyond Cool

    Published 31 May 2019

    Hao Wu

    A Higher Order

    Published 30 May 2019

  • Aye Aye Captain

    Alexandre Bonvin

    Published 29 April 2019

    The PARP Family Family

    John Pascal

    Published 28 February 2019

  • Frame by frame

    Nikolaus Grigorieff

    Published 28 January 2019

    Predicting Success

    Bil Clemons

    Published 18 December 2018

  • Curiouser and Curiouser

    Ramaswamy Subramanian

    Published 27 November 2018

    Rely on This

    Sjors Scheres

    Published 26 October 2018

  • Proteins out of bounds

    Gerhard Wagner

    Published 27 September 2018

    Hiding in plain sight

    Gaya Amarasinghe

    Published 27 July 2018

  • Jumping Genes

    Orsolya Barabas

    Published 27 June 2018

    Data Whisperer

    Karolin Luger

    Published 30 May 2018

  • Flipping the Switch

    Jacqueline Cherfils

    Published 27 April 2018

    Tooling Around

    Andrew Kruse

    Published 29 March 2018

  • Comings and Goings

    Tom Rapoport, Ph.D.

    Published 23 February 2018

    Transcriptional Rhythm

    Seth Darst

    Published 27 January 2018

  • The Language of Gene Regulation

    Daniel Panne

    Published 21 November 2017

    Not Your Average Protein

    James Fraser

    Published 23 October 2017

  • Message Received

    Sebastien Granier

    Published 24 August 2017

    Resistance is Futile

    Celia Schiffer

    Published 28 July 2017

  • Twist of Fate

    Leemor Joshua-Tor

    Published 28 June 2017

    Drug Designer

    John Buolamwini

    Published 30 May 2017

  • Mathematically Minded

    James Holton

    Published 28 April 2017

    Garbage Out

    Kay Diederichs

    Published 30 March 2017

  • Fixer Upper

    Brandt Eichman

    Published 27 February 2017

    Mobilizers

    Phoebe Rice

    Published 31 January 2017

  • Escape Artist

    Katya Heldwein

    Published 19 December 2016

    Nature’s Confectioner

    Jochen Zimmer

    Published 29 November 2016

  • State of Fusion

    Jason McLellan

    Published 27 October 2016

    Here Be Dragons

    Brian Fox

    Published 28 September 2016

  • SBGrid Assumes Ownership of PyMOLWiki

    Published 15 September 2016

    Pharm Team

    Oleg Tsodikov

    Published 24 August 2016

  • Spiro-Gyra

    Alejandro Buschiazzo

    Published 27 July 2016

    Turning the DIALS

    Nicholas Sauter

    Published 29 June 2016

  • Pipeline Dreams

    Bridget Carragher and Clint Potter

    Published 26 April 2016

    U-Store-It

    The SBGrid Data Bank provides an affordable and sustainable way to preserve and share structural biology data

    Published 28 March 2016

  • Big Questions, Big Answers

    Jennifer Doudna

    Published 22 February 2016

    Not a Structural Biologist

    Enrico Di Cera

    Published 17 December 2015

  • Divide and Conquer

    Kevin Corbett

    Published 19 November 2015

    Computing Cellular Clockworks

    Klaus Schulten

    Published 23 October 2015

  • Trans-Plant

    Gang Dong

    Published 26 September 2015

    Keep on Moving

    James Berger

    Published 23 August 2015

  • Totally Tubular

    Antonina Roll-Mecak

    Published 27 July 2015

    From Disorder, Function

    Julie Forman-Kay

    Published 29 June 2015

  • Into Alignment

    Geoff Barton

    Published 27 May 2015

    Two Labs, Many Methods

    Michael Sattler

    Published 28 April 2015

  • Picture This

    Georgios Skiniotis

    Published 20 March 2015

    Intron Intrigue

    Navtej Toor

    Published 20 February 2015

  • Cut and Paste

    Martin Jinek

    Published 28 January 2015

    Basics and Beyond

    Qing Fan

    Published 18 December 2014

  • Bloodletting and Other Studies

    Pedro José Barbosa Pereira

    Published 25 November 2014

    Wire Models, Wired

    A brief history of UCSF Chimera

    Published 29 October 2014

  • In Search of…New Drugs

    Doug Daniels

    Published 30 September 2014

    An Affinity for Affinity…and Corals

    John C. Williams

    Published 29 August 2014

  • Pete Meyer, Ph.D.

    Research Computing Specialist

    Published 22 August 2014

    Justin O'Connor

    Sr. System Administrator

    Published 20 August 2014

  • Carol Herre

    Software Release Engineer

    Published 15 August 2014

    Elizabeth Dougherty

    Science Writer

    Published 13 August 2014

  • Andrew Morin, Ph.D.

    Policy Research Fellow

    Published 11 August 2014

    Jason Key, Ph.D.

    Associate Director of Technology and Innovation

    Published 8 August 2014

  • Piotr Sliz, Ph.D.

    Principal Investigator, SBGrid

    Published 1 August 2014

    New Kid on the Block

    James Chen

    Published 29 July 2014

  • Membrane Master

    Tamir Gonen

    Published 30 June 2014

    The Natural Bridge

    Piotr Sliz

    Published 13 June 2014

  • Surprise, Surprise

    Catherine Drennan

    Published 26 April 2014

    Gone Viral

    Olve Peersen

    Published 20 March 2014

  • All Who Wander Are Not Lost

    Frank Delaglio

    Published 24 February 2014

    The Raw and the Cooked

    Graeme Winter

    Published 24 January 2014

  • Vacc-elerator

    Peter Kwong

    Published 17 December 2013

    Structural Storyteller

    Karin Reinisch

    Published 15 November 2013

  • The Fixer

    Jane Richardson

    Published 28 October 2013

    Inside the Box

    Mishtu Dey

    Published 17 September 2013

  • Sensing a Change

    Brian Crane

    Published 16 August 2013

    Towards Personalized Oncology

    Mark Lemmon

    Published 16 July 2013

  • Brush with Fame

    Yizhi Jane Tao

    Published 14 June 2013

    Toxic Avenger

    Borden Lacy

    Published 21 May 2013

  • Pushing the Boundaries

    Stephen Harrison

    Published 22 April 2013

    Strength in Numbers

    Joseph Ho

    Published 18 March 2013

  • One Lab, Many Methods

    Wesley Sundquist

    Published 12 February 2013

    Unplanned Pioneer

    Tim Stevens

    Published 15 January 2013

  • From Actin to Action

    Emil Pai

    Published 11 January 2013

    Unstructured

    A Brief History of CCP4

    Published 12 December 2012

  • Stop, Collaborate and Listen

    Eleanor Dodson

    Published 5 November 2012

    X-PLORer

    Axel Brunger

    Published 1 October 2012

  • Share the Wealth

    Zbyszek Otwinowski

    Published 22 August 2012

    Unraveling RNA

    Anna Pyle

    Published 18 July 2012

  • Sharper Image

    Pawel Penczek and SPARX

    Published 4 June 2012

    Creative Copy Cat

    Pamela Bjorkman

    Published 25 April 2012

  • Charm and Diplomacy

    Gerard Kleywegt

    Published 7 March 2012

    From Curiosity to Cure

    Marc Kvansakul

    Published 13 December 2011

  • The Lure of the Sandbox

    Paul Emsley and Coot

    Published 15 October 2011

    Springsteen, Tolkien, Protein

    Alwyn Jones and Frodo

    Published 17 June 2011

  • Structures Solved Simply

    Paul Adams and Tom Terwilliger on Phenix

    Published 2 June 2011

    Escape from the Darkroom

    Wolfgang Kabsch and XDS

    Published 19 May 2011

  • Playing the Odds

    Randy Read and Phaser

    Published 19 May 2011

    Better, Faster, Stronger, More

    Victor Lamzin and ARP/wARP

    Published 17 May 2011

  • Crystallography for Kids

    Lynne Howell

    Published 17 May 2011

    Side-Track to Success

    Ning Zheng

    Published 13 May 2011

Scroll